Write My Paper Button

a brief description of your topic of research interest. Next, state the philosop

a brief description of your topic of research interest. Next, state the philosophical orientation that reflects your worldview and explain the epistemological and ontological assumptions of this orientation. Then, explain how these assumptions lend themselves to one or more research approaches.
Im a referral specialist, I’ve chosen to concentrate on processing patient referrals to specialist or other healthcare providers. I enjoy being the middle person between the patients, providers, and their insurance company to make sure they are able to see the specialist that they need to continue their care.
RSCH_8110_Week1_Discussion_Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDiscussion Posting Content
15 to >13.4 pts
EXCELLENT
Discussion posting demonstrates an excellent understanding of all of the concepts and key points presented in the text(s) and Learning Resources. Posting provides significant detail (including multiple relevant examples), evidence from the readings and other scholarly sources, and discerning ideas.
13.4 to >11.9 pts
GOOD
Discussion posting demonstrates a good understanding of most of the concepts and key points presented in the text(s) and Learning Resources. Posting provides moderate detail (including at least one pertinent example), evidence from the readings and other scholarly sources, and discerning ideas.
11.9 to >10.4 pts
FAIR
Discussion posting demonstrates a fair understanding of the concepts and key points as presented in the text(s) and Learning Resources. Posting may be lacking or incorrect in some area, or in detail and specificity, and/or may not include sufficient pertinent examples or provide sufficient evidence from the readings.
10.4 to >0 pts
POOR
Discussion posting demonstrates poor or no understanding of the concepts and key points of the text(s) and Learning Resources. Posting is incorrect and/or shallow, and/or does not include any pertinent examples or provide sufficient evidence from the readings.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePeer Feedback and Interaction
10 to >8.9 pts
EXCELLENT
Response posting is excellent and fully contributes to the quality of interaction by offering substantive constructive critiques, suggestions, in-depth questions, additional resources, and stimulating thoughts and/or probes that draw from the readings and other scholarly sources.
8.9 to >7.9 pts
GOOD
Response posting is good and partially contributes to the quality of interaction by offering adequate constructive critiques, suggestions, in-depth questions, additional resources, and stimulating thoughts and/or probes that draw from the readings and other scholarly sources.
7.9 to >6.9 pts
FAIR
Response posting is fair and partially contributes to the quality of interaction but offers insufficient constructive critiques or suggestions, shallow questions, or provides poor quality additional resources.
6.9 to >0 pts
POOR
Student does not interact with peers (0 points) or the response posting does not contribute to the quality of interaction by offering any constructive critiques, suggestions, questions, or additional resources.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting
5 to >4.4 pts
EXCELLENT
Postings are well organized, use scholarly tone, contain original writing and proper paraphrasing, follow APA Style, contain very few or no writing and/or spelling errors, and are fully consistent with graduate-level writing style.
4.4 to >3.9 pts
GOOD
Postings are mostly consistent with graduate-level writing style. Postings may have some small organization, scholarly tone, writing, or APA Style issues, and/or may contain a few writing and spelling errors.
3.9 to >3.4 pts
FAIR
Postings are somewhat below graduate-level writing style. Postings may be lacking in organization, scholarly tone, APA Style, and/or contain many writing and/or spelling errors, or show moderate reliance on quoting versus original writing and paraphrasing.
3.4 to >0 pts
POOR
Postings are well below graduate-level writing style expectations for organization, scholarly tone, APA Style, and writing, or show heavy reliance on quoting.
5 pts

a brief description of your topic of research interest. Next, state the philosop

a brief description of your topic of research interest. Next, state the philosophical orientation that reflects your worldview and explain the epistemological and ontological assumptions of this orientation. Then, explain how these assumptions lend themselves to one or more research approaches.
Im a referral specialist, I’ve chosen to concentrate on processing patient referrals to specialist or other healthcare providers. I enjoy being the middle person between the patients, providers, and their insurance company to make sure they are able to see the specialist that they need to continue their care.
RSCH_8110_Week1_Discussion_Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDiscussion Posting Content
15 to >13.4 pts
EXCELLENT
Discussion posting demonstrates an excellent understanding of all of the concepts and key points presented in the text(s) and Learning Resources. Posting provides significant detail (including multiple relevant examples), evidence from the readings and other scholarly sources, and discerning ideas.
13.4 to >11.9 pts
GOOD
Discussion posting demonstrates a good understanding of most of the concepts and key points presented in the text(s) and Learning Resources. Posting provides moderate detail (including at least one pertinent example), evidence from the readings and other scholarly sources, and discerning ideas.
11.9 to >10.4 pts
FAIR
Discussion posting demonstrates a fair understanding of the concepts and key points as presented in the text(s) and Learning Resources. Posting may be lacking or incorrect in some area, or in detail and specificity, and/or may not include sufficient pertinent examples or provide sufficient evidence from the readings.
10.4 to >0 pts
POOR
Discussion posting demonstrates poor or no understanding of the concepts and key points of the text(s) and Learning Resources. Posting is incorrect and/or shallow, and/or does not include any pertinent examples or provide sufficient evidence from the readings.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePeer Feedback and Interaction
10 to >8.9 pts
EXCELLENT
Response posting is excellent and fully contributes to the quality of interaction by offering substantive constructive critiques, suggestions, in-depth questions, additional resources, and stimulating thoughts and/or probes that draw from the readings and other scholarly sources.
8.9 to >7.9 pts
GOOD
Response posting is good and partially contributes to the quality of interaction by offering adequate constructive critiques, suggestions, in-depth questions, additional resources, and stimulating thoughts and/or probes that draw from the readings and other scholarly sources.
7.9 to >6.9 pts
FAIR
Response posting is fair and partially contributes to the quality of interaction but offers insufficient constructive critiques or suggestions, shallow questions, or provides poor quality additional resources.
6.9 to >0 pts
POOR
Student does not interact with peers (0 points) or the response posting does not contribute to the quality of interaction by offering any constructive critiques, suggestions, questions, or additional resources.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting
5 to >4.4 pts
EXCELLENT
Postings are well organized, use scholarly tone, contain original writing and proper paraphrasing, follow APA Style, contain very few or no writing and/or spelling errors, and are fully consistent with graduate-level writing style.
4.4 to >3.9 pts
GOOD
Postings are mostly consistent with graduate-level writing style. Postings may have some small organization, scholarly tone, writing, or APA Style issues, and/or may contain a few writing and spelling errors.
3.9 to >3.4 pts
FAIR
Postings are somewhat below graduate-level writing style. Postings may be lacking in organization, scholarly tone, APA Style, and/or contain many writing and/or spelling errors, or show moderate reliance on quoting versus original writing and paraphrasing.
3.4 to >0 pts
POOR
Postings are well below graduate-level writing style expectations for organization, scholarly tone, APA Style, and writing, or show heavy reliance on quoting.
5 pts

Need help with your paper?

X
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, how can I help?