I need this assignment in two hours Assignment Guidelines Peruse your library o

I need this assignment in two hours
Assignment Guidelines
Peruse your library or internet and select a company’s annual report that you find compelling and interesting. There are many annual reports readily viewable online and some of them are digital which adds another dimension to the experience.   
Write an analysis of a company’s annual report visuals such as the effective use of photographs, diagrams, and charts to portray information. Refer to your text to support your analysis and attribute appropriately. Do not do a financial analysis, but again, an image/visual analysis as it relates to the effectiveness of these elements in portraying data and information.
Your report should be between 750 and 1000 words in length. You must use headings to identify the graphic elements assessed. Do not write a financial analysis. This is a graphic/image analysis and data should be analyzed only in this context. Consult the area in your text that addresses the use of images, visual design, etc.
Parameters
Your response should be between 750 and 1000 words in length
The assignment should be double-spaced and 12-point Times New Roman font, with one-inch margins
Any resources (including textbooks) must be cited and referenced in adherence with APA documentation style
See the assignment rubric below for more details
Due: Sunday at 11:59 p.m. ET
Plagiarism
You are expected to write primarily in your own voice, using paraphrase, summary, and synthesis techniques when integrating information from class and outside sources. Use an author’s exact words only when the language is especially vivid, unique, or needed for technical accuracy. Failure to do so may result in charges of academic dishonesty.
Overusing an author’s exact words, such as including block quotations to meet word counts, may lead your readers to conclude that you lack appropriate comprehension of the subject matter or that you are neither an original thinker nor a skillful writer.
Rubric
COM 2224 Assignment Rubric
COM 2224 Assignment Rubric
CriteriaRatingsPts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFocus and Organization
15 ptsExcellent
All information is organized in a clear, logical way. Introduction and/or conclusion strongly convey the topic and thesis statement.
11.5 ptsGood
Most information is organized in a clear, logical way. One section or piece of information seems out of place. Introduction and/or conclusion clearly convey the topic and thesis statement.
7.5 ptsBorders on Acceptance
Some information is logically sequenced. An occasional section or piece of information seems out of place. The introduction and/or conclusion is vague.
4.5 ptsUnacceptable
Paper is not logically organized. Poor introduction and/or conclusion.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEvaluative Effort of Concepts
15 ptsExcellent
The work is exemplary in providing a comprehensive effort to discern or apply concepts from the readings to the response.
11.5 ptsGood
Significant effort made to discern or apply concepts from the readings to the response.
7.5 ptsBorders on Acceptance
Some effort made to discern or apply concepts from the readings to the response.
4.5 ptsUnacceptable
Little to no effort made to discern or apply concepts from readings to the response.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Thinking
15 ptsExcellent
Work is consistent and detailed and strongly reflects critical-thinking skills. The paper has a logical approach and professional appearance.
11.5 ptsGood
Reflects satisfactory critical-thinking skills by use of consistent logic and commentary on the ideas provided. A few sections could use more detail.
7.5 ptsBorders on Acceptance
Inconsistent, but acceptable, critical thinking skills displayed by use of some logic and commentary on the ideas provided.
4.5 ptsUnacceptable
Work does not reflect critical thinking in that there is no logic to the ideas provided.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar and Mechanics; Quality of Paper
10 ptsExcellent
Paper has no misspellings or grammatical errors. It is in a clear, readable format.
8 ptsGood
Grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors occur rarely.
5 ptsBorders on Acceptance
Few grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors occur in the paper.
2 ptsUnacceptable
Grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors significantly interfere with reading the paper.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMLA Style, Citations, and References
5 ptsExcellent
Few, if any, APA errors. Paper is written in a scholarly style. All sources are correctly written in the in-text citations and on the references page.
4 ptsGood
APA style errors are rare. Paper is written in a scholarly style. Few sources are incorrectly written in either the in-text citations or on the references page.
2.5 ptsBorders on Acceptance
APA style errors are noticeable. Paper is not scholarly written. Sources are incorrectly written in either the in-text citations or on the references page.
1 ptsUnacceptable
APA style is not used or poorly attempted. Presentation is informal in tone and word choice. Quotations are not properly referenced in the paper.
5 pts
Total Points: 60