Unit 10Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Instructions The assignment this week i

Unit 10Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion
Instructions
The assignment this week is to write a paper about the importance of inclusive communities and ways in which macro social workers can advocate for inclusion.
Write a 3 -4 page paper (double spaced) covering the prompts below.
Please be sure to cite your sources and add a reference page at the end (not included in the 3 pages).
Describe the impact of discrimination and oppression on marginalized groups within communities
Use recent social work literature – you can choose any group or community to write about.
Remember community doesn’t have to be a geographic community but could be an identification community.
You can use Social Work Today, or any information in the Social Work Library Guide.
Describe the benefits of inclusion in communities.
Describe how inclusive environments impacts individuals and communities.
Based on the Community tool kit readings, identify and discuss 3 strategies for increasing inclusion in the community.
Describe the role of macro social workers and how they can advocate for inclusion and populations at risk.
Complete this assignment and submit it to this assignment dropbox by Sunday at 11:59 pm CT.
Estimated time to complete: 4 hours
Rubric
MSW521 DEI Assignment Rubric
MSW521 DEI Assignment Rubric
CriteriaRatingsPts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTopic
4 ptsLevel 5
Identifies a creative, focused, and manageable topic that addresses potentially significant aspects of the topic.
3.2 ptsLevel 4
Identifies a creative, focused, and manageable topic that addresses important and notable aspects of the topic.
2.4 ptsLevel 3
Identifies a focused and manageable/doable topic that appropriately addresses relevant aspects of the topic.
1.6 ptsLevel 2
Identifies a topic that while manageable/doable, is too narrowly focused and leaves out relevant aspects of the topic.
0.8 ptsLevel 1
Identifies a topic that is far too general and wide-ranging as to be manageable and doable.
0 ptsLevel 0
Does not clearly identify a topic that is relative to the assignment.
4 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExisting Knowledge, ResearchDescribes the impact of discrimination and oppression on marginalized groups within communities.
9 ptsLevel 5
Synthesizes in-depth information from relevant sources representing various points of view/approaches.
7.2 ptsLevel 4
Examines in-depth information from relevant sources representing various points of view/approaches.
5.4 ptsLevel 3
Explains in-depth information from relevant sources representing various points of view/approaches.
3.6 ptsLevel 2
Explains in-depth information from relevant sources representing various points of view/approaches.
1.8 ptsLevel 1
Relates information from irrelevant sources representing limited points of view/ approaches.
0 ptsLevel 0
Information is irrelevant to the topic. No clear point of view/approaches.
9 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExisting Knowledge, ResearchDescribe the benefits of inclusion in communities
Describes how inclusive environment impacts individuals and communities
9 ptsLevel 5
All elements of the methodology or theoretical framework are skillfully developed. Appropriate methodology or theoretical frameworks may be synthesized from across disciplines or from relevant sub-disciplines.
7.2 ptsLevel 4
Most critical elements of the methodology or theoretical framework are appropriately developed. Appropriate methodology or theoretical frameworks may be analyzed from across disciplines or from relevant sub-disciplines.
5.4 ptsLevel 3
Some critical elements of the methodology or theoretical framework are appropriately developed, however, more subtle elements are ignored or unaccounted for.
3.6 ptsLevel 2
Critical elements of the methodology or theoretical framework are missing, incorrectly developed, or unfocused.
1.8 ptsLevel 1
Inquiry design demonstrates a misunderstanding of the methodology or theoretical framework.
0 ptsLevel 0
The design of the paper is not based upon a clear methodology or framework.
9 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysisIdentify and analize 3 strategies for increasing inclusion in the community
9 ptsLevel 5
Organizes and synthesizes evidence to reveal insightful patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.
7.2 ptsLevel 4
Organizes and analyzes evidence to reveal insightful patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.
5.4 ptsLevel 3
Organizes evidence to reveal important patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.
3.6 ptsLevel 2
Organizes evidence, but the organization is not effective in revealing important patterns, differences, or similarities.
1.8 ptsLevel 1
Describes evidence, but it is not organized and/or is unrelated to focus.
0 ptsLevel 0
Lists evidence, but it is not organized and/or is unrelated to focus.
9 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysisDescribe the role of macro social workers and how they can advocate for inclusion and populations at risk.
9 ptsLevel 5
Organizes and synthesizes evidence to reveal insightful patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.
7.2 ptsLevel 4
Organizes and analyzes evidence to reveal insightful patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.
5.4 ptsLevel 3
Organizes evidence to reveal important patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.
3.6 ptsLevel 2
Organizes evidence, but the organization is not effective in revealing important patterns, differences, or similarities.
1.8 ptsLevel 1
Describes evidence, but it is not organized and/or is unrelated to focus.
0 ptsLevel 0
Lists evidence, but it is not organized and/or is unrelated to focus.
9 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion
5 ptsLevel 5
States a conclusion that is a logical extrapolation from the inquiry findings.
4 ptsLevel 4
States a conclusion that is a logical interpretation of the inquiry findings.
3 ptsLevel 3
States a conclusion focused solely on the inquiry findings. The conclusion arises specifically from and responds specifically to the inquiry findings.
2 ptsLevel 2
States a general conclusion that, because it is so general, also applies beyond the scope of the inquiry findings.
1 ptsLevel 1
States an ambiguous or unsupportable conclusion from inquiry findings.
0 ptsLevel 0
No conclusion is presented
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Formatting
5 ptsLevel 5
The required APA elements are all included with correct formatting, including in-text citations and references.
4 ptsLevel 4
The required APA elements are all included with minor formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.
3 ptsLevel 3
The required APA elements are all included with multiple formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.
2 ptsLevel 2
The required APA elements are not all included. AND/OR there are major formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.
1 ptsLevel 1
Several APA elements are missing. The errors in formatting demonstrate limited understanding of APA guidelines, in-text-citations, and references.
0 ptsLevel 0
APA is not used
5 pts
Total Points: 50