Question?
Freedom of the press and the right to a fair trial are complimentary, but some trials generate so much publicity that the parties’ right to an impartial jury is jeopardized. In addition, publicity about other cases or social or cultural issues can create generic prejudice that can influence jurors’ reasoning in a particular case. Forensic psychologists have studied the effects of pre-trial publicity on potential factfinders and have also evaluated various mechanisms for reducing the adverse effects of pre-trial publicity.
What are some mechanisms for reducing the adverse effects of pre-trial publicity? In what ways does pre-trial publicity pose a danger to fair trials? How can these dangers be reduced?
Students must follow the APA writing style, particularly:
Parenthetical and Narrative In-Text Citations.
References.
Heading Levels.
