What is different about the symphonies composed by Beethoven compared to Haydn?

Part A 100 word response using vocab attached below
1. What is different about the symphonies composed by Beethoven compared to Haydn?
2. What was Beethoven’s handicap? When did this occur in his career? What are your personal reflections upon this obstacle and his persistence to keep composing?
3. Why was Mozart not successful in Vienna? What are your personal thoughts about Mozart?
Part B respond to both posts with 25 words at least
1. The difference about the symphonies composed by Beethoven compared to Haydn is that they were better constructed and gave the forms and techniques for the classical period more intensity. His work was more surprising such as building up the music and then going soft instead of playing something more powerful like you would expect. Haydn’s symphonies composed of melodies that were easier to remember and were repetitive. His work was more organized and put together. Both composers had a lot of talent and success but for different reasons.
Beethoven’s handicap was that he was deaf. He lost his hearing around the age of 44 during the middle of his career which is referred to as his experimental style period. After my personal reflections upon this obstacle and his persistence to keep composing I believe that he is truly talented. Composing music is challenging without adding being deaf to it. I can’t imagine how much he had to adjust and change to continue to compose music. This shows the passion and determination that he had for it. Beethoven going deaf but still composing and creating beautiful pieces just goes to show how talented he truly was.
Mozart was not successful in Vienna because he had a lot of financial trouble. While in Vienna, they wanted him to continuously write a more popular style of music or they would refuse to pay him for his work. It is very easy for the taste in musical style to change and that can be hard to keep up with. This can be especially hard if your passion is for a certain style. I believe that Mozart was a great and talented composer. I don’t think that his work was appreciated as much as it should have been. Mozart was just given a bad hand financially. Everyones music taste can continuously change. Not everyone is going to like the same style over and over especially if different styles are being composed. That doesn’t mean the work he was creating was bad, just not accurately appreciated.
2.The symphonies of Beethoven are usually viewed as being more dramatic, passionate, and garde than those of Haydn. Beethoven pushed the limits of symphonic writing with his bold and creative musical ideas, in comparison to Haydn, whose symphonies frequently followed a fairly predictable structure and musical language. The way Haydn and Beethoven handle harmony in their symphonies is one of the biggest differences between them. By using difficult and unexpected chords, Beethoven expanded the symphonic music’s harmonic language and gave his compositions a greater, more intense emotional quality. Also, he experimented with unusual harmonies, such as harsh chords and rapid modulations, which gave his music a dramatic and tense feel.
Beethoven experienced progressive hearing loss throughout his career, which first became noticeable in his late 20s and progressively got worse with time. He was fully deaf by the time he was in his forties, but he nevertheless managed to write some of his most revolutionary pieces, such as his Ninth Symphony and his final string quartets. The loss of this capacity had a significant negative effect on his emotional state and sense of identity since as a musician, his ability to hear and communicate with people was essential to his profession.
The popularity of Mozart was declining in Vienna due to a variety of circumstances. One was the rise of an entirely different generation of composers, such as Haydn and eventually Beethoven, who were expanding the limits of classical music in novel and fascinating ways. Another was Mozart’s own wilful ignorance and unwillingness to play to the audience’s expectations, which frequently put him at war with his peers’ tastes and preferences. I agree that Mozart made a significant contribution to the field of classical music. His legacy has motivated generations of artists and music fans all across the world. His music is a testimony to the strength of imagination and creativity.