Your argument essay allows you to dive deeper into your opinions and assertions

Your argument essay allows you to dive deeper into your opinions and assertions about the issue you analyzed or something new. Here is your chance to really point to your issue with the issue. Start with the problems that you have with problem. You will develop a position and integrate what you learned about argumentation and persuasive appeals. Please note that this is not simply a revision of your issue analysis, it is a reengagement with the issue, perhaps taking into consideration a new audience and fresh angle. Now that you have more knowledge, you can generate an academic argument. Perhaps you want to tackle a sub-topic of related to the social problem. Maybe you argue for or against a policy. Think about your topic, audience and purpose as you develop your argument. Happy Writing. The essay should be in MLA format also
MY topic c is should cell phones be banned while driving? My stance being yes they should be
I have pasted the rubric so you can have a good idea of what exactly needs to be done. This is my second time trying for this essay as the first time came back at 70% similarity score so be sure to have a works cited page and cite the work in the essay. Also please be sure to no plagarize as i want unique work
CriteriaRatingsPts
Complexity
view longer description
20 to >13.33 pts
argument is multi-dimensional, re: kinds of evidence, warrants, and counter-arguments
13.33 to >6.67 pts
argument offers more limited evidence, warrants, counter-arguments
6.67 to >0 pts
argument weakened by overmuch simplicity in evidence, warrants, counterarguments
0 pts
argument is missing a key element, either evidence, warrants, or counterarguments
/ 20 pts
Coherence / Style
view longer description
10 to >6.67 pts
Sentence-structure varied in distinctive, consistent, original voice and memorable phrases
6.67 to >3.33 pts
Sentence-structure less varied, voice less distinctive, with occasional lapses into the less-than-graceful
3.33 to >0 pts
Sentence-structure repetitive, dull, and often awkward
0 pts
Several sentences sufficiently ill-formed to distract reader from intended message
/ 10 pts
Thesis/Claim
view longer description
15 to >9 pts
Full Marks
Contains an arguable claim that develops fresh insight and challenges the reader’s think9 to >6 pts
3
Contains an arguable claim that is somewhat original. Thesis and purpose are fairly clear.6 to >0 pts
2
Thesis may be obvious or unimaginative. Thesis and purpose are somewhat vague0 pts
No Marks
Reader cannot determine thesis and purpose OR thesis has no arguable claim./ 15 pts
Support/Reasoning
view longer description
20 to >12 pts
Full Marks
The writer includes rhetorical elements (logos, pathos, ethos) in the development of ideas. Assumptions are made explicit. Details are relevant, original, and convincingly interpreted.12 to >8 pts
3
The writer includes 2 rhetorical elements in the development of ideas. Offers solid but less original reasoning. Assumptions are not always recognized or made explicit.8 to >0 pts
2
The writer includes 1 rhetorical element in the development of ideas. Offers somewhat obvious support that may be too broad. Details are too general, not interpreted, irrelevant to thesis, or inappropriately repetitive.0 pts
No Marks
The writer focuses on own thoughts and beliefs about the topic; neglects the rhetorical elements. Offers simplistic, undeveloped, or cryptic support for the ideas./ 20 pts
Opposing Views/Counter
view longer description
10 to >6 pts
Full Marks
Author acknowledges the opposing view and argues it logically.6 to >4 pts
3
Author acknowledges the opposing view, but does not present sound counterpoint.4 to >0 pts
2
Refutation paragraph missing and/or vague. There are one or two examples that are not sound, logical argument.0 pts
No Marks
Refutation missing or vague. Obvious lack of sound, logical argument throughout./ 10 pts
Structure/Organization
view longer description
15 to >9 pts
Full Marks
Logical, compelling progression of ideas in essay;clear structure which enhances and showcases the central idea or theme and moves the reader through the text. Organization flows so smoothly the reader hardly thinks about it. Effective, mature, graceful transitions exist throughout the essay9 to >6 pts
3
Overall, the paper is logically developed. Progression of ideas in essay makes sense and moves the reader easily through the text. Strong transitions exist throughout and add to the essay’s coherence Progression of ideas in essay is awkward, yet moves the reader through the text without too much confusion. The writer sometimes lunges ahead too quickly or spends too much time on details that do not matter. Transitions appear sporadically, but not equally throughout the ssay. Arrangement of essay is unclear and illogical. The writing lacks a clear sense of direction. Ideas, details or events seem strung together in a loose or random fashion; there is no identifiable internal structure and readers have trouble following the writer’s line of thought. Few, forced transitions in the essay or no transitions are present.6 to >0 pts
2
Progression of ideas in essay is awkward, yet moves the reader through the text without too much confusion. The writer sometimes lunges ahead too quickly or spends too much time on details that do not matter. Transitions appear sporadically, but not equally throughout the s0 pts
No Marks
Arrangement of essay is unclear and illogical. The writing lacks a clear sense of direction. Ideas, details or events seem strung together in a loose or random fashion; there is no identifiable internal structure and readers have trouble following the writer’s line of thought. Few, forced transitions in the essay or no transitions are present./ 15 pts
Following Guidelines
view longer description
10 pts
Full Marks
Student meets all criteria in terms of page length, source material, formatting etc.6 pts
3
Student meets most of the criteria0 pts
No Marks
Student ignores a large part of the assignment/ 10 pts